Is wikipedia.org legit?
Verdict for wikipedia.org
No major warning signs found.
Trust score
99/100
This website has been online for about 25 years and is one of the most visited sites in the world. It is not on any security blacklist, and its security certificate and email protections are set up properly.
“Likely legit” means our automated checks found no warning signs when they ran. It is not an endorsement of this website, its sellers or its products, and it can change.
Last checked: 18 hours ago ()
Short answer: wikipedia.org looks legit: our automated check on Nov 6, 2026 found no sign that it is a scam and rated it “Likely legit” (trust score 99/100), because the domain was registered 25 years ago and the Internet Archive first saved it in 2001, which shows a very long history; it ranks #38 among the most visited websites, and it is not a lookalike of another brand.
How we score: see how this score works Checked by IsSiteLegit's automated system on .
Disclaimer: Automated assessment based on public signals. Not a guarantee. Always verify before paying.
Share this result Report this site Are you the owner of this site?
Why we gave this result
-
In favour: The domain was registered 25 years ago and the Internet Archive first saved it in 2001, which shows a very long history.
Based on: Domain age , Internet Archive history
-
In favour: It ranks #38 among the most visited websites, and it is not a lookalike of another brand.
Based on: Popularity , Brand impersonation
-
In favour: It is not found on any security blacklist we check, including Spamhaus and Google Safe Browsing.
Based on: Security blacklists , Spamhaus domain blocklist
-
In favour: Security certificates have been seen for this domain for 18 years, and over 1,000 web addresses under it have had certificates, which shows a large and long-lasting presence.
Based on: First seen online , Online footprint , Security certificate (HTTPS)
-
In favour: Email protections are set up, so fake emails pretending to come from this domain are blocked.
Based on: Email anti-spoofing
These reasons were written with help from AI and checked against the evidence below. How we use AI
Evidence we found
Every signal we checked, and whether it is a good or bad sign.
Good signs (8)
Good sign: Domain age
Registered 25 years ago (2001-01-13)
Good sign: Internet Archive history
First saved by the Internet Archive 25 years ago (2001-07-27)
Good sign: Email anti-spoofing
Set up: fake emails pretending to come from this domain are blocked (SPF and DMARC)
Good sign: First seen online
First security certificate seen 18 years ago (2008-05-09)
Good sign: Online footprint
1167 different web addresses under this domain have had security certificates (e.g. lo.wikipedia.org, diq.wikipedia.org, ln.wikipedia.org)
Good sign: Security blacklists
Not found on any blacklist we check (URLhaus, ThreatFox, OpenPhish, PhishDestroy, Google Safe Browsing)
Good sign: Spamhaus domain blocklist
Not listed
Good sign: Popularity
Ranked #38 among the most visited websites (Tranco list)
Other details (12)
For information: Registered through
MarkMonitor Inc.
For information: Registration paid until
2027-01-13 (in 2 months)
For information: Domain owner
Owner details are hidden for privacy, as is normal for most domains today
For information: Website online
The domain points to a web server
For information: Email set up
Can receive email at its own address (mail server: mx-in1001.wikimedia.org)
For information: Hosting provider
Hosted by Wikimedia Foundation Inc. in the United States (network AS14907)
For information: Security certificate (HTTPS)
Valid certificate issued by Let's Encrypt
For information: Brand impersonation
Popular site — not a lookalike
For information: Contact details
We could not read this site's contact details. Very popular sites often block automated checkers like ours
For information: Policy pages
We could not read this site's policy pages (privacy, refunds, terms). Very popular sites often block automated checkers like ours
For information: User reports
No confirmed user reports
For information: Mentioned elsewhere online
2 independent pages mention this site, e.g. "Wikipedia.org — What Is It, How Reliable Is It, and Wh..." (factually.co), "Is This Website Legit?" (1lookup.io)
Questions about wikipedia.org
Is wikipedia.org safe?
Our check found no major warning signs, so wikipedia.org is likely a real website. No check can promise that every order or deal on a site is safe, so pay with a card or a service that offers buyer protection.
Is wikipedia.org a scam?
We can't prove whether any website is honest, but we found no sign that wikipedia.org is a known scam. Not found on any blacklist we check (URLhaus, ThreatFox, OpenPhish, PhishDestroy, Google Safe Browsing).
How old is wikipedia.org?
Domain registration: Registered 25 years ago (2001-01-13). First security certificate seen 18 years ago (2008-05-09).
Is wikipedia.org a well-known website?
Yes. Ranked #38 among the most visited websites (Tranco list). Popular sites are rarely outright fakes, but scammers do copy their names, so check the address carefully.
Answers come from this check only. Read how to check a website yourself.
What other websites say (2) Pages on other websites that mention this site. Open them to read what they say; we don't control their content.
- Wikipedia.org — What Is It, How Reliable Is It, and Wh...
factually.co
- Is This Website Legit?
1lookup.io
Share this result
Send this link to a friend or family member before they buy from this site.
Related guides
- How to check if a website is legit
- How to spot a fake online store
- How to check a link before you click it
Latest from our blog
- Fake Buyer Scams: Why You Never Enter Card Details to Get Paid
- Task Jobs That Pay You to Like Videos: How the Scam Works
- Fake Virus Warnings and Tech Support Scams: What to Do
Popular checks
- Is opticalh.com legit?
- Is allegra-k.com legit?
- Is ups.com legit?
- Is whatnot.com legit?
- Is tickpick.com legit?
- Is zenfy.ac legit?
More results: popular websites recently checked websites recently flagged high-risk sites scam and phishing statistics
Check history
This is the first check of this site.
No result yet
This site has not been checked before. A check takes about 10–30 seconds.
- Domain info waiting
- DNS and SSL certificate waiting
- Blacklists and reputation waiting
- Page analysis waiting
- Verdict waiting
User reports (0)
No confirmed reports from users yet.
User reports are personal experiences. Our moderators review them, but they are not independently verified.
Report this site
Had a bad experience with this website? Tell us. It helps protect others.